The claimant had been convicted of murder after evidence was given in camera. He sought to apply to the ECHR challenging the fairness of the trial, arguing that he needed and shoudl be free to use the material given in camera.
Held: The application for judicial review failed.
Elias LJ, Hickinbottom J
[2014] EWHC 3558 (Admin), [2015] Crim LR 224, [2015] 3 WLR 1050, [2015] 3 All ER 354, [2015] 1 Cr App R 10
Bailii
European Convention on Human Rights 34
England and Wales
Citing:
See Also – Yam, Regina v CACD 28-Jan-2008
An order had been made for the trial of the defendant on a charge of murder to be held excluding both press and public. The Order had been made in the interests of national security and for the protection of the identity of a witness or other . .
Cited by:
Appeal from – Wang Yam, Regina (on The Application of) v Central Criminal Court and Another SC 16-Dec-2015
The appellant was to apply to the ECHR challenge the fairness of his trial because it was held partially in camera. The UK resisted this application. The appellant sought to be permitted in his response to disclose and refer to contents of the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Criminal Practice, Human Rights
Updated: 12 November 2021; Ref: scu.538206