The question is whether, a full Employment Tribunal having been empanelled to hear and determine the appellant, Mrs Unwin’s complaint of victimisation contrary to the Sex Discrimination Act 1975, the Chairman of that Employment Tribunal, Mr Rich, was entitled to strike out the complaint under Rule 13(2)(e) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure and thereafter to make a consequent costs order against the appellant, sitting alone.
Judges:
Peter Clarke HHJ
Citations:
[2000] UKEAT 1068 – 98 – 0102
Links:
Statutes:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
See Also – Unwin v Sackville School and Another EAT 30-Jul-1997
. .
See Also – Unwin v Sackville School and Another EAT 1-Mar-1998
. .
See Also – Unwin v Sackville School and Another EAT 15-Dec-1999
EAT Procedural Issues – Employment Tribunal . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Employment, Discrimination
Updated: 13 July 2022; Ref: scu.264845