Raja v Van Hoogstraten: ChD 11 Nov 2005

The defendant sought adjournment of the trial of his action.
Held: The defendant had tried to frustrate the hearing of the case. The delay was refused with leave for legal representatives appointed for the trial to renew an application.

Judges:

Lightman J

Citations:

[2005] EWHC 2522 (Ch)

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

See Also – Raja v Van Hoogstraten and others CA 23-Sep-2005
Misdirected letter from court. . .

Cited by:

See Also – Raja v Van Hoogstraten and others ChD 17-Nov-2005
The defendant had sought an adjournment, which was refused, with specified conditions for any renewed application.
Held: The present application was not by solicitors who had accepted instructions to appear at the trial, and therefore did not . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Litigation Practice

Updated: 13 July 2022; Ref: scu.235025