The bank had obtained a freezing order. The defendants had claimed four substantial loan agreements, but the Bank asserted that these were shams. The first defendant had been found guilty of contempt, and now seemed to have fled the country.
Judges:
Christopher Clarke J
Citations:
[2012] EWHC 1819 (Comm), [2012] 2 CLC 641, [2012] 2 All ER (Comm) 1243
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Appeal from – JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov CA 25-Jul-2013
The claimant bank had an asset freezing order in place over the assets of the defendant. The defendant had in place loan facilities allowing him to draw down substantial amounts as chosen. The claimant appealed from refusal of a declaration that the . .
At first instance – JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov SC 21-Oct-2015
The court was asked as to the interpretation and application of the standard form freezing order. In the course of long-running litigation between JSC BTA Bank and Mr Ablyazov the Bank had obtained a number of judgments against the respondent . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Litigation Practice, Banking
Updated: 03 November 2022; Ref: scu.461920