IPO Section 5(2)(b): – Opposition failed.
Section 5(3): – Opposition failed.
Section 5(4)(a): – Opposition failed.
The opposition was based on the marks MR. AND MRS. (in various formats) registered in respect of a television programme of the same name, and various goods (including a board game), off-shoots related to the programme.
The Sections 5(3) and 5(4)(a) grounds were quickly dismissed as the evidence of use provided was insufficient for the purpose.
Turning to the opposition based on Section 5(2)(b) the Hearing Officer found some of the goods to be identical. Having compared the marks, however, the Hearing Officer found that whilst there was some similarity in them, in that both contained the words MR AND MRS, there were significant differences. In the result she found no likelihood of confusion and the opposition consequently failed on all grounds.
Judges:
Mrs A Corbett
Citations:
[2005] UKIntelP o09305, O/093/05
Links:
Intellectual Property
Updated: 19 October 2022; Ref: scu.456287