South Lanarkshire Council v Coface Sa: SCS 27 Jan 2015

Outer House The pursuer seeks payment of the sum of andpound;4,499,410.32 under a performance guarantee Bond. The defender contends that the notice served by the pursuer to trigger the Bond was invalid. Liability turns on two interlinked issues. First, what is the proper construction of the Bond? Second, did the notice comply with the terms of the Bond?

Judges:

Lord Woolman

Citations:

[2015] ScotCS CSOH – 8

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

Scotland

Construction

Updated: 06 June 2022; Ref: scu.541998