House v Chief Constable of Avon and Somerset: EAT 23 Jan 2009

EAT SEX DISCRIMINATION: Burden of proof
The Tribunal in applying Igen and Madarassy were correct in their approach to primary findings and inference, particularly in relation to knowledge of the protected acts and reasons for the detriment.

Citations:

[2009] UKEAT 0061 – 08 – 2301

Links:

Bailii

Employment, Discrimination

Updated: 22 July 2022; Ref: scu.280159