The judge had awarded the costs of part of an action to one party, and provided that overall the costs were to be assessed if not agreed. The applicant sought to have its costs own assessed.
Held: The order did not differentiate between the different parts on the question of assessment, and it was not possible to assess one part of the costs as opposed to the whole. Such a deferred assessment was different in nature from deciding whether a party would receive all or part of its costs.
Judges:
Pill LJ, Sir Martin Nourse
Citations:
Times 21-Oct-2002, [2002] EWCA Civ 1126, [2002] All ER (D) 468, [2002] LLR 624, [2003] CPLR 41
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
See Also – Regina (on the Application of Chorion Plc) v Westminster City Council Admn 5-Oct-2001
A licensing policy had been challenged and then amended by the defendant council to meet the claimant’s concerns. Though the remaining issue was as to costs; the judge had to decide whether the challenge had been well founded.
Held: The policy . .
Main Judgment – Chorion Plc v Westminster City Council CA 5-Mar-2002
renewed application for permission to appeal – costs after withdrawal of application for judicial review. . .
Cited by:
Cited – JD Wetherspoon Plc, Regina (on the Application Of) v Guildford Borough Council Admn 11-Apr-2006
The company sought judicial review of the decision of the respondent to apply its cumulative impact policy to their application for extended licensing hours.
Held: The company’s application amounted to a material variation of the license, and . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Costs, Licensing
Updated: 06 June 2022; Ref: scu.177476