Eildon Ltd v Sharkey: EAT 28 Jul 2004

EAT Practice and Procedure – Employment Tribunal made adverse findings against Respondent when the point had not been put to its 3 witnesses in XX. Remit to new Employment Tribunal.

Judges:

McMullen QC J

Citations:

[2004] UKEAT 0109 – 03 – 2807, EATS/0109/03

Links:

Bailii, EAT

Statutes:

Employment Rights Act 1996 99

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

CitedMeek v City of Birmingham District Council CA 18-Feb-1987
Employment Tribunals to Provide Sufficient Reasons
Tribunals, when giving their decisions, are required to do no more than to make clear their findings of fact and to answer any question of law raised.
Bingham LJ said: ‘It has on a number of occasions been made plain that the decision of an . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Employment

Updated: 11 June 2022; Ref: scu.200573