EAT Disability Discrimination – The Respondent’s case, as pleaded, was that the Claimant was guilty of dishonesty. This was never fully adjudicated upon although it seems this was a matter raised at the Employment Tribunal for determining the issues of the reason for dismissal, and in particular, whether it was a reason connected with the employee’s disability; it was vital that the ET make full findings as to the allegations set out in the ET3.
Judges:
Pugsley J
Citations:
[2011] UKEAT 0142 – 11 – 1608
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Employment, Discrimination
Updated: 04 October 2022; Ref: scu.450620