Abusabib and Another v Taddese: EAT 2 Aug 2011

EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Appellate jurisdiction/reasons/Burns-Barke
Relief from sanctions was given under PD16 and CPR3.9 when evidence in support of a response, but not a draft ET3 response form, was filed in time. The point on diplomatic immunity could not be said to be without merit. Roberts v Carling and Aziz applied.

Judges:

McMullen QC J

Citations:

[2011] UKEAT 1819 – 10 – 0208

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

See Also – Abusabib and Another v Taddese EAT 20-Dec-2012
EAT Jurisdictional Points : State Immunity – Diplomatic Immunity
The First Respondent, who had been found liable together with the Second Respondent for acts of discrimination against the Claimant in a . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Employment

Updated: 15 September 2022; Ref: scu.443642