Mehta v Child Support Agency: EAT 5 Nov 2010

EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Procedural irregularity
Tribunal entitled to take Claimant’s witness statement as read, notwithstanding that two of the Respondent’s witnesses had been permitted to read their statements out loud, in circumstances where the Judge had explained that course to the Claimant and obtained her consent.
Observations on when witnesses statements need and need not be read aloud.

Judges:

Underhill P J

Citations:

[2010] UKEAT 0127 – 10 – 0511, [2011] ICR D7, [2011] IRLR 305

Links:

Bailii

Employment

Updated: 28 August 2022; Ref: scu.426919