The court considered a grant of rights to take water. Sir Wilfred Greene MR said: ‘It was a grant of the residue of what should reach them after the water had been taken by the persons entitled to takle water from those branches’
Judges:
Sir Wilfred Greene MR
Citations:
[1938] 1 All ER 595
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – Mitchell v Potter CA 20-Jan-2005
By a conveyance the owner of a spring granted to a neighbour the right to take and use water. He now said that the extent of water taken was excessive.
Held: No identical gtant was found from decided cases. The grant was not an easement but a . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Land
Updated: 23 June 2022; Ref: scu.221718