Goldsmith v Goldsmith: CA 31 Oct 2006

Appeal against sentence of twelve months’ imprisonment for breach of non-molestation order.
On finding breaches of a non-molestation order, the court may not impose a custodial sentence on the contemnor without first hearing his mitigation.

Judges:

Wall LJ, Lloyd LJ

Citations:

Times 22-Nov-2006, [2006] EWCA Civ 1670

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

CitedHale v Tanner CA 22-Aug-2000
When attaching a power of arrest on a non-molestation order the court should consider attaching it only to that element which restricts violence or proximity rather than to any part relating to harassment. When considering sentence for a breach, the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Criminal Sentencing, Contempt of Court

Updated: 28 May 2022; Ref: scu.246965