EAT Practice and Procedure – Estoppel
EAT Practice and Procedure – Estoppel or Abuse of Process.
Judges:
Mr Recorder Luba QC
Citations:
[2003] EAT 0266 – 03 – 0207, [2003] UKEAT 0266 – 03 – 0207, EAT/142/03, EAT/266/03
Links:
Citing:
Cited – King v Great Britain China Centre CA 1991
The court considered the nature of evidence which will be available to tribunals considering a race discrimination claim.
Held: A complainant must prove his or her case on the balance of probabilities, but it is unusual to find direct evidence . .
Cited – Dr Anya v University of Oxford and Another CA 22-Mar-2001
Discrimination – History of interactions relevant
When a tribunal considered whether the motive for an act was discriminatory, it should look not just at the act, but should make allowance for earlier acts which might throw more light on the act in question. The Tribunal should assess the totality . .
See Also – Deman v Association of University Teachers EAT 7-Oct-2003
. .
Cited by:
See Also – Deman v Association of University Teachers EAT 7-Oct-2003
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Discrimination, Employment
Updated: 08 June 2022; Ref: scu.191706