Hibbs and Birmingham v United Kingdom: ECHR 18 Jul 1996

Quakers objected to the obligation to contribute through general taxation to funds which may then be used by the State for arms procurement.
Held: The Convention is directed primarily to the personal sphere of personal belief and worship and does not guarantee the right to behave in the public sphere of society as a whole in a way which is dictated by particular religious beliefs. The claim was inadmissible.

Citations:

11991/96

Cited by:

CitedRegina (Amicus etc) v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry Admn 26-Apr-2004
The claimants sought a declaration that part of the Regulations were invalid, and an infringement of their human rights. The Regulations sought to exempt church schools from an obligation not to discriminate against homosexual teachers.
Held: . .
CitedRegina (Amicus etc) v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry Admn 26-Apr-2004
The claimants sought a declaration that part of the Regulations were invalid, and an infringement of their human rights. The Regulations sought to exempt church schools from an obligation not to discriminate against homosexual teachers.
Held: . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Human Rights

Updated: 29 April 2022; Ref: scu.196024