Challenge to parking regulations.
Held: The appeal succeeded. In assessing the decision it was open to the court to consider and elucidate the reasoning behind the option of the parking scheme. Assuming that the 1975 Order was valid, the reasons for adopting the Directions were not reasons significantly concerned with the operation or management of the harbour, and insofar as the Directions affected Castle Terrace directly, no, or at any rate no proper, consideration was given to the fact that the adoption of the Directions might invade a property right of the appellants without adequate justification and without compensation.
Judges:
Lord Justice Sedley P, Lord Justice Neuberger
Citations:
[2004] EWCA Civ 1000
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
Leave – Richards and Another, Regina (on the Application of) v Pembrokeshire County Council CA 8-Jun-2004
Unlawfulness of parking regulations . .
Cited by:
Cited – Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd, Regina (on The Application of) v The Independent Reviewer of Advertising Standards Authority Adjudications Admn 10-Nov-2014
The two supermarkets had price matching comparison schemes. Sainburys complained that the Independent Reviewer’s decsion that the ASA’s response to is complant as to the Tesco scheme was itself flawed. They had complained that the selections for . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Road Traffic, Land
Updated: 11 June 2022; Ref: scu.199735