EAT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Postponement or stay
Employment Tribunal refused to postpone remedy hearing until after appeals by both parties heard at full hearing by the Employment Appeal Tribunal. Material factor not brought to Employment Judge by party opposing postponement application. Applying Wednesbury principles Judge was thereby led into error. Exercising powers of Employment Tribunal under s35(1) Employment Tribunals Act 1996 appeal allowed and postponement granted.
Judges:
Peter Clark J
Citations:
[2008] UKEAT 0478 – 08 – 0512
Links:
Statutes:
Employment Tribunals Act 1996 35(1)
Cited by:
See Also – Bascetta v Abbey National Plc EAT 20-Feb-2009
EAT DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION
TRADE UNION RIGHTS
Where the ET relied, crucially on material in coming to its decision which did not form part of the explicitly pleaded case with which the appellant’s . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Employment
Updated: 22 July 2022; Ref: scu.279941