Regina v Boyes: 1860

A witness, an accomplice in a criminal offence, who has received the pardon of the Crown under the Great Seal for that offence, has no privilege of refusing to answer questions relating to the offence, which may tend to criminate himself. He is bound to answer.

Citations:

[1860] EngR 170, (1860) 2 F and F 157, (1860) 175 ER 1004

Links:

Commonlii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

Appeal fromRegina v Boyes 27-May-1861
A defendant seeking to avoid answering questions so as not to incriminate himself is to be given some understanding and latitude in respecting his own interpretation. The beneficiary of a pardon could be called upon to incriminate himself because he . .
CitedBeghal v Director of Public Prosecutions SC 22-Jul-2015
Questions on Entry must be answered
B was questioned at an airport under Schedule 7 to the 2000 Act, and required to answer questions asked by appropriate officers for the purpose set out. She refused to answer and was convicted of that refusal , contrary to paragraph 18 of that . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Litigation Practice, Criminal Practice

Updated: 07 May 2022; Ref: scu.285009