Regina v Bathurst: CACD 1968

The judge was bound to direct the jury that a defendant was fully entitled to sit back and see if the prosecution had proved its case, and that they must not make any assumption of guilt from the fact that he had not gone into the witness box. Diminished responsibility is not an issue to which the credibility of the defendant is in any way relevant.

Citations:

[1968] 2 QB 99

Statutes:

Homicide Act 1957 2

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedRegina v Becouarn HL 28-Jul-2005
At his trial for murder, the defendant had not given evidence, and the court had allowed the jury to draw proper inferences under s35.
Held: The JSB direction ‘on drawing inferences [i]s sufficiently fair to defendants, emphasising as it does . .
CitedRegina v Andrews CACD 15-Oct-2003
The defendant sought leave to appeal her conviction for murder saying that a finding of manslaughter was appropriate for her diminished responsibility.
Held: There was insufficient evidence to establish that the judge’s directions on the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Criminal Practice

Updated: 30 April 2022; Ref: scu.229098