EAT Jurisdictional Points: Extension of Time: Just and Equitable
Although there were aspects of the procedure adopted by the Employment Tribunal which were not ideal, the appeal was dismissed as there was no error of law disclosed:
(i) In their decision that the Claimant had not put forward a case that her dismissal (which took place less than three months before the ET1) was part of a continuous course of conduct involving sex discrimination which otherwise ended more than three months before the ET1;
(ii) In their decision that it would not be just and equitable to allow her claims based on that course of conduct to proceed.
Shanks HHJ
[2015] UKEAT 0331 – 14 – 0302
Bailii
England and Wales
Employment
Updated: 29 December 2021; Ref: scu.545907
