ECHR The applicants alleged that they had suffered a discriminatory breach of their right to respect for their correspondence (Articles 8 and 14). Several of them also complained that the national authorities had lacked independence and impartiality, that the disciplinary proceedings had not been public, and that the national courts had failed to give reasons for their decisions (Article 6 – 1). Some also alleged that the proceedings had been unfair (Article 6 – 3 (a), (b) and (c)) and that they had not had access to an effective remedy (Article 13). Lastly, certain applicants relied on Articles 9, 10, 17 and 18 of the Convention.
Francoise Tulkens, P
15672/08 – Chamber Judgment, [2011] ECHR 2423, (2014) 58 EHRR 27
Bailii
European Convention on Human Rights
Human Rights
Updated: 27 December 2021; Ref: scu.541946
