The plaintiff sought damages for personal injuries. The defendants had refused to disclose the evidene they wished to bring to establish that he hwas not as severely injured as he had claimed.
Held: The plaintiff’s appeal against refusal of an order for disclosure was dismissed. ‘It was necessary to keep well in mind the principle that the interests of justice were best served by the early disclosure of all relevant material.’
Judges:
Neill LJ
Citations:
[1988] 1 WLR 913
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Superceded – Khan v Armaguard Ltd CA 23-Feb-1994
The plaintiff had been injured when, as a passenger in his employer’s security van, it turned over as it left the motorway. Liability was not disputed but the defendants alleged that the plaintiff was malingering and said that they had video . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Litigation Practice
Updated: 07 October 2022; Ref: scu.541910
