Lord St Leonards v Ashburner: 1869

(Sussex Spring Assizes) Lord St Leonards had bought some land and planted trees on what he thought was his side of the boundary. Some 20 years later Mr Ashburner bought the adjoining land and claimed that the trees were on his side of the boundary. The plan was too small to provide a clear answer. Bramwell B directed the jury ‘Title deeds come to little without evidence of actual enjoyment, for otherwise anyone might pretend to give away the lands of anybody else. Parchment, of itself, comes to little; the real question is as to actual enjoyment.’

Judges:

Bramwell B

Citations:

(1869) 21 LT 595

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedAli v Lane and Another CA 21-Nov-2006
The parties disputed the boundary between their neighbouring plots of land.
Held: In the modern law the conveyance (parchment or not) is undoubtedly the starting point. Where information contained in the conveyance is unclear or ambiguous, it . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Land

Updated: 10 May 2022; Ref: scu.246345