Kincses v Hungary: ECHR 27 Jan 2015

The applicant alleged, in particular, that his freedom of expression had been infringed on account of him having been fined for having criticised, as a legal representative, the sitting judge in one of his cases. He also claimed that the length of the disciplinary proceedings conducted against him was incompatible with Article 6 of the Convention.

Judges:

Guido Raimondi, P

Citations:

66232/10 – Chamber Judgment, [2015] ECHR 82

Links:

Bailii

Statutes:

European Convention on Human Rights 10

Jurisdiction:

Human Rights

Human Rights

Updated: 24 October 2022; Ref: scu.541933