EAT Sex Discrimination and Disability Discrimination – Victimisation
The ET gave no weight to relevant admissible probative evidence because of a misapprehension of the circumstances of its being adduced. Its Decision is set aside and remitted to a fresh tribunal as a fair trial was not held. The ET also failed to apply correctly the principles in Morse relating to the duty to make reasonable adjustments. Its finding of bad faith, though not an issue at the hearing, did not vitiate its rejection of the victimisation claims. Its award of costs of andpound;10,000 fell with the substantive decision.
Judges:
His Honour Judge McMullen QC
Citations:
UKEAT/1223/02 – 2007, [2004] UKEAT 1223 – 02 – 2007
Links:
Cited by:
See Also – Kahn v University of Warwick and others EAT 20-Jul-2004
. .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Discrimination, Employment
Updated: 11 June 2022; Ref: scu.199910
