An established trust had collected subscriptions over many years, ptting those subscriptions wth other funds derived from the sale of one school property for the purchase of another. That property in turn came to be sold, and questions arose as to the need for permission of the Charity Commissioners under the 1835 Act.
Held: Inter alia, that the Trustees of the charity had implied the authority of the donors to select the trusts for the charity, and that the land sale was derived from a donation to a mixed charity and could be applied as income, and as such was exempt from control by the Commissioners.
Judges:
Parker J
Citations:
[1912] 2 Ch 167, [1912] 81 LJ Ch 627, (1912) 107 LT 254
Statutes:
Citing:
Considered – Attorney-General v Mathieson CA 1907
The Rev John Wilkinson, ran charities in Stoke Newington in London, including ‘the Mildmay Mission to the Jews’. He was given received andpound;1350 from ‘a lady’ locally who suggested that the money be used for a convalescent home. He pointed out . .
Cited by:
Cited – Shergill and Others v Khaira and Others SC 11-Jun-2014
The parties disputed the trusts upon which three Gurdwaras (Sikh Temples) were held. The Court of Appeal had held that the issues underlying the dispute were to be found in matters of the faith of the Sikh parties, and had ordered a permanent stay. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Charity, Trusts
Updated: 04 May 2022; Ref: scu.543043
