Appeal against the decision of the Industrial Tribunal that FDR, Respondents to proceedings brought by Mr Holloway claiming unfair selection for redundancy, should provide discovery of specified documents and further particulars relating to Mr Holloway’s selection for redundancy.
Judges:
Mummery P H
Citations:
[1995] IRLR 400, [1995] UKEAT 240 – 95 – 2604
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Cited – Lowe v Everest Ltd and others EAT 3-Aug-2001
The respondents had decided to make redundancies. They had two shifts of workers, and those eventually selected came predominantly from the one shift. The question was whether the method chosen for selection was fair or unfair. In cases of mass . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Employment
Updated: 07 June 2022; Ref: scu.180899
