Clark v Norton: 1910

The court explained the notion of ‘comment’ as ‘something which is or can reasonably be inferred to be a deduction, inference, conclusion, criticism, remark, observation, etc’.

Judges:

Cussen J

Citations:

[1910] VLR 494

Jurisdiction:

Australia

Cited by:

CitedKeays v Guardian Newspapers Limited, Alton, Sarler QBD 1-Jul-2003
The claimant asserted defamation by the defendant. The parties sought a decision on whether the article at issue was a comment piece, in which case the defendant could plead fair comment, or one asserting fact, in which case that defence would not . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Defamation, Commonwealth

Updated: 12 May 2022; Ref: scu.184407