EAT Practice and Procedure – Appeal challenged the asserted failure of an Employment Judge to recognise or exercise a discretion to extend time for seeking Written Reasons for a Judgment delivered orally. The correspondence from the Employment Judge, viewed fairly, demonstrated that he had recognised that discretion to extend time existed, and exercised it against the Claimant.
Further challenges to the exercise of the discretion to extend time, on the basis of misdirection in law and Wednesbury unreasonableness, also failed.
Simler J
[2014] UKEAT 0173 – 14 – 2110
Bailii
England and Wales
Employment
Updated: 24 December 2021; Ref: scu.540262
