Boeve v Skipwith: 1678

The Bill is a Supplemental Bill, to have a further Discovery from the Defendant by Way of Evidence, for the better clearing the Matters depending on the Account, which the Defendant hath not answered in the former Cause.
The Plaintiff pleaded the former Bill, to which the Defendant answered, and the Cause heard, and the Account directed.
This Court ordered the Defendant to answer to all Matters in this Bill, not answered to in the former Cause, but the Plaintiff not to reply, nor to proceed further.

Citations:

[1678] EngR 10, (1678-79) 2 Rep Ch 142, (1678) 21 ER 640 (B)

Links:

Commonlii

Citing:

See AlsoSir Ralph Bovey v Skipwith 1671
Mortgage Priorities
In 1651, Sir Francis Drake made the Plaintiff a Security out of the Manor and Rectory of Waltham upon Thames. Afterwards in 1656, Drake made the Defendant a Security for Money out of the Rectory only (the Defendant having no Notice then of the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Litigation Practice

Updated: 02 May 2022; Ref: scu.402742