Sections 5(2)(b) and 5(3)* *An objection under Section 3 was dismissed as it had been based on relative grounds – The opposition was based on the opponents’ marks ACRYSOF and ACRYPAK, registered in Class 10. The Hearing Officer did not find a likelihood of confusion arising from these marks; the Section 5(2)(b) objection failed therefore. Under Section 5(3) the Hearing Officer found that the opponents had not demonstrated the required reputation.
Judges:
Mr M Foley
Citations:
[2001] UKIntelP o55901
Links:
Intellectual Property
Updated: 13 October 2022; Ref: scu.454495
