Click the case name for better results:

Young, Regina v: CACD 16 Mar 2018

Judges: Lord Justice Gross Mrs Justice Lang DBE And Mr Justice Phillips Citations: [2018] EWCA Crim 3017 Links: Bailii Statutes: Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 329(1) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Criminal Sentencing Updated: 10 November 2022; Ref: scu.682131

Haque, Regina v: CACD 23 May 2019

Consideration of some of the provisions relating to offences of money laundering set out in the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. Citations: [2019] EWCA Crim 1028, [2020] 1 WLR 2239, [2020] WLR(D) 49 Links: Bailii, WLRD Statutes: Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 329(1) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Crime Updated: 03 August 2022; Ref: scu.639305

Wilkinson, Regina (on the Application of) v Director of Public Prosecutions: Admn 22 Jun 2006

The defendant sought judicial review of the decision to charge him under the Act for being in possession of a stolen motor-cycle. He said he had been over-charged. Held: Unlike a conviction for handling stolen goods, the offence under the 2002 Act did not require the defendant to know that the object was stolen. ‘if … Continue reading Wilkinson, Regina (on the Application of) v Director of Public Prosecutions: Admn 22 Jun 2006

Kausar, Regina v: CACD 22 Apr 2009

Renewed application to appeal against conviction of acquiring criminal property contrary to section 329(1)(a) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. Citations: [2009] EWCA Crim 922 Links: Bailii Statutes: Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 329(1)(a) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Crime Updated: 30 March 2022; Ref: scu.430788

Pattison, Regina v: CACD 13 Jun 2007

Appeal against confiscation order. Judges: Toulson LJ, Walker J, Wadsworth QC HHJ Citations: [2008] 1 Cr App R (S) 51, [2008] Crim LR 62, [2007] EWCA Crim 1536 Links: Bailii Statutes: Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 328(1) 329(1) Criminal Sentencing Updated: 13 September 2022; Ref: scu.440356

Angus v United Kingdom Border Agency: Admn 11 Mar 2011

The appellant appealed by case stated against an order for forfeiture of andpound;40,000 cash seized by the respondent on her entering the UK. The Crown Court, on appeal from the Magistrates Court, had found that that cash ‘may well have been’ the proceeds of money laundering or of income tax evasion, but it made no … Continue reading Angus v United Kingdom Border Agency: Admn 11 Mar 2011