Search Results for: Insolvency Act 1986 303

Click the case name for better results:

Acts

1267 – 1278 – 1285 – 1297 – 1361 – 1449 – 1491 – 1533 – 1677 – 1688 – 1689 – 1700 – 1706 – 1710 – 1730 – 1737 – 1738 – 1751 – 1774 – 1792 – 1793 – 1804 – 1814 – 1819 – 1824 – 1828 – 1831 – 1832 … Continue reading Acts

Hardy v Focus Insurance Co (In Liquidation): ChD 19 Jul 1996

The Court has no power to direct the Official Receiver as to suspension of bankruptcy. Citations: Times 19-Jul-1996, [1997] BPIR 77 Statutes: Insolvency Act 1986 303(1) 303(2) Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: Cited – Bagnall QC v the Official Receiver ChD 18-Jun-2003 The bankrupt was to receive his automatic discharge. The receiver had applied … Continue reading Hardy v Focus Insurance Co (In Liquidation): ChD 19 Jul 1996

Mulkerrins v Pricewaterhousecoopers (A Firm): ChD 29 Mar 2000

Where a bankrupt wished to pursue an action held for him personally rather than his creditors. Held: The trustee in bankruptcy held the right of action in trust for the bankrupt, but declined to sue. The bankrupt had the right to join the trustee as a co-defendant and to commence the action under his own … Continue reading Mulkerrins v Pricewaterhousecoopers (A Firm): ChD 29 Mar 2000

Re Bullard and Taplin Ltd: ChD 1996

Tne question of whether there was at any time ‘pending court proceedings’ was answered by asking if there existed a court file. The section empowered a court itself to appoint another trustee in bankruptcy. Section 41 of the 1984 Act could be used by the HighCourt to take some control over proceedings for an individual … Continue reading Re Bullard and Taplin Ltd: ChD 1996

Mulkerrins v Pricewaterhousecoopers (A Firm): CA 12 Jan 2001

A trustee in bankruptcy had had vested in him the legal title to an action for damages for the loss to personal reputation and status of the bankrupt. Held: A declaration that he had no interest in a claim for damages against a former insolvency practitioner, was not a judgment in rem, making him a … Continue reading Mulkerrins v Pricewaterhousecoopers (A Firm): CA 12 Jan 2001

Baxendale-Walker v Irwin Mitchell Llp and Others 3572: ChD 20 Dec 2018

Judges: Deputy Insolvency and Companies Court Judge Agnello QC Citations: [2018] EWHC 3572 (Ch) Links: Bailii Statutes: Insolvency Act 1986 303 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Cited by: See Also – Baxendale-Walker v Irwin Mitchell Llp and Others 3423 ChD 20-Dec-2018 Judgment in application by fifth defendant for a limited civil restraint order. . . Lists … Continue reading Baxendale-Walker v Irwin Mitchell Llp and Others 3572: ChD 20 Dec 2018

HM Revenue and Customs v Ariel: ChD 8 Jul 2016

The trustee in bankruptcy appealed against an order as to compliance with statutory notices issued by HMRC. The trustee argued that all but one of the orders was made in excess of jurisdiction. Mann J [2016] EWHC 1674 (Ch) Bailii Insolvency Act 1986 303, Finance Act 2008 Sch 36 England and Wales Insolvency, Taxes Management … Continue reading HM Revenue and Customs v Ariel: ChD 8 Jul 2016

It’s A Wrap (UK) Ltd v Gula and Another: ChD 16 Sep 2005

The defendant company directors were accused of having paid dividends to themselves when the company was in fact making a loss. Held: A claim might lie, but the pleadings did not phrase it adequately, and an amendment would be improper. Though payments had been made at a time when the company ws making losses, a … Continue reading It’s A Wrap (UK) Ltd v Gula and Another: ChD 16 Sep 2005

Seager, Regina v; Regina v Blatch: CACD 26 Jun 2009

The court considered how to determine in the context of applications for confiscation orders, the value of the ‘benefit’ obtained by an offender who has been guilty of managing a company as a director in contravention of a director’s disqualification order or an undertaking not to act as a director. Held: The values were to … Continue reading Seager, Regina v; Regina v Blatch: CACD 26 Jun 2009

Sigma Finance Corporation, Re; (in administrative receivership): SC 29 Oct 2009

The court considered how the losses of the insolvent company were to be distributed as between secured creditors and preferential creditors, given the terms of the applicable trust deed. Held: The court considered the interpretations of the deed, looking at the ‘landscape of the instrument as a whole’ and interpretations given. The Court emphasised the … Continue reading Sigma Finance Corporation, Re; (in administrative receivership): SC 29 Oct 2009

Law Society of England and Wales and others v Shah and others: ChD 30 Nov 2007

Solicitor firms had been made bankrupt leaving a shortfall after thefts from client accounts of over 12 million pounds. The thief had diappeared, and the other partners were now discharged form bankruptcy. The Law Society accepted that it could not proceed to claim against the discharged bankrupts, but now sought recovery from their insurers. Held: … Continue reading Law Society of England and Wales and others v Shah and others: ChD 30 Nov 2007

BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd v Eurosail-UK 2007-3BL Plc and Others: CA 7 Mar 2011

The court was asked questions to interpret the terms of interest-bearing notes, which were issued by Eurosail-UK 2007-3BL PLC, a special purpose vehicle formed to hold income-producing assets, consisting of mortgage loans, to be used to meet the liabilities on the Notes, and in particular whether the rspondent had been insolvent when entering into them. … Continue reading BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd v Eurosail-UK 2007-3BL Plc and Others: CA 7 Mar 2011

OTG Ltd v Barke and Others: EAT 16 Feb 2011

EAT TRANSFER OF UNDERTAKING – InsolvencyAdministration proceedings pursuant to Schedule B1 of the Insolvency Act 1986 are not capable of constituting ‘bankruptcy . . or . . analogous insolvency proceedings which have been instituted with a view to the liquidation of the assets of the transferor’ within the meaning of reg. 8 (7) of TUPE … Continue reading OTG Ltd v Barke and Others: EAT 16 Feb 2011

Basch v Stekel and Another: CA 25 Jul 2000

The deceased had given a guarantee of the tenant’s covenant given by his company under a lease. The court was asked whether the obligations under the guarantee survived his death after he company was wound up. Held: Chadwick LJ explained the Hindcastle case: ‘Lord Nicholls explained in Hindcastle v. Barbara Attenborough why the former practice … Continue reading Basch v Stekel and Another: CA 25 Jul 2000

Halabi v London Borough of Camden: ChD 14 Feb 2008

Ms Halabi applied to annul her bankruptcy order, made for non payment of her rates. She applied within approximately 6 months of her adjudication. Her bankrupt estate was solvent but illiquid. She had not previously appreciated that she had sufficient equity in her property (over andpound;70k) to borrow sufficient to discharge her debt. Held: The … Continue reading Halabi v London Borough of Camden: ChD 14 Feb 2008

Holder v The Law Society: Admn 26 Jul 2005

The applicant challenged the independence of the respondent’s disciplinary tribunal. Held: The claim failed: ‘the nature of the Tribunal is entirely adequately independent and impartial for the purposes for which it is constituted. The reasonable by-stander, properly informed of the facts, could not consider otherwise.’ The tribunal had properly considered all the evidence as to … Continue reading Holder v The Law Society: Admn 26 Jul 2005

Re Sigma Finance Corp: CA 25 Nov 2008

[2008] EWCA Civ 1303, [2009] BCC 393 Bailii Insolvency Act 1986 England and Wales Citing: Cited – Sigma Finance Corporation, Re Insolvency Act 1986 ChD 7-Nov-2008 . . Cited by: Appeal From – Sigma Finance Corporation, Re; (in administrative receivership) SC 29-Oct-2009 The court considered how the losses of the insolvent company were to be … Continue reading Re Sigma Finance Corp: CA 25 Nov 2008

Heath v Tang, Stevens v Peacock: CA 11 Aug 1993

The bankrupt applicants each applied to the Court of Appeal for leave to appeal against the judgment for a liquidated sum on which the bankruptcy petition had been based. In the first case, the trustee in bankruptcy indicated his unwillingness to pursue an appeal; in the second, no trustee had been appointed. Held: A bankrupt … Continue reading Heath v Tang, Stevens v Peacock: CA 11 Aug 1993

Brook v Reed: CA 25 Mar 2011

The court was asked ‘What relation should the costs and remuneration bear to the circumstances, and in particular the size, of the bankruptcy?’ The bankrupt had considered that the costs first awarded to the trustee in bankruptcy and the trustee’s solicitors were disproportionate. On appeal they had been reduced, but he appealed again seeking a … Continue reading Brook v Reed: CA 25 Mar 2011