Search Results for: Insolvency Act 1986 216

Click the case name for better results:

Churchill and Another v First Independent Factors and Finance Ltd.: CA 30 Nov 2006

‘the circumstances in which a person who was a director of a company when it went into insolvent liquidation may be brought within an exception to the provisions of sections 216 and 217 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (‘the Act’) – provisions which would otherwise render that person liable for the debts and liabilities of … Continue reading Churchill and Another v First Independent Factors and Finance Ltd.: CA 30 Nov 2006

First Independent Factors and Finance Ltd v Mountford: ChD 23 Apr 2008

The claimant factors sought to attach personal liability to the debts of the company to the defendant director saying that he was in breach of section 216. Judges: Lewison J Citations: [2008] EWHC 835 (Ch) Links: Bailii Statutes: Insolvency Act 1986 216 Jurisdiction: England and Wales Company, Insolvency Updated: 14 July 2022; Ref: scu.267061

Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Jabble and Others: CA 22 Jul 1997

The Secretary of State sought company director disqualification orders. The defendants challenged the administrative receivership, saying that the appointment of the administrative receiver was invalid, and hence that the conditions of section 6 were not satisfied and the Secretary of State was not entitled to rely on the section as the basis for the disqualification … Continue reading Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Jabble and Others: CA 22 Jul 1997

Collier v P and M J Wright (Holdings) Ltd: CA 14 Dec 2007

Agreement for payment by joint debtor not contract The claimant appealed against refusal of an order to set aside a statutory demand. He said that he had compromised a claim by the creditors. He argued for an extension to the Rule in Pinnel’s case, so that where a debtor agrees to pay part of a … Continue reading Collier v P and M J Wright (Holdings) Ltd: CA 14 Dec 2007

Morphitis v Bernasconi and others: CA 5 Mar 2003

The appellants had been directors of a company which fell into difficulties. A new company was begun, and traded, and the other continued for a year before being wound up by a landlord. The lease was disclaimed. Only the landlord lost out. He claimed that the directors had continued to trade with intent to defraud. … Continue reading Morphitis v Bernasconi and others: CA 5 Mar 2003

Herbert Berry Associates Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners; re Herbert BerrySP, Regina (on The Application of) v The Lord Chancellor: HL 1977

The principle to the effect that the court should exercise its discretion to restrain a distress levied by a landlord before the commencement of a winding-up only where there were special circumstances rendering it inequitable that he should be permitted to do so, applies also to a distress levied by the Crown under a statutory … Continue reading Herbert Berry Associates Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners; re Herbert BerrySP, Regina (on The Application of) v The Lord Chancellor: HL 1977

Re Bullard and Taplin Ltd: ChD 1996

Tne question of whether there was at any time ‘pending court proceedings’ was answered by asking if there existed a court file. The section empowered a court itself to appoint another trustee in bankruptcy. Section 41 of the 1984 Act could be used by the HighCourt to take some control over proceedings for an individual … Continue reading Re Bullard and Taplin Ltd: ChD 1996

Dow Jones and Co Inc v Jameel: CA 3 Feb 2005

Presumption of Damage in Defamation is rebuttable The defendant complained that the presumption in English law that the victim of a libel had suffered damage was incompatible with his right to a fair trial. They said the statements complained of were repetitions of statements made by US authorities. The claimant had asserted that no more … Continue reading Dow Jones and Co Inc v Jameel: CA 3 Feb 2005

Re Ledingham-Smith: ChD 1993

The bankrupt’s accountants had been paid their fees by standing order. Arrears mounted and the sum was increased. On the bankruptcy, the trustee sought to recover the increased payment. The court considered whether they had been given a preference. Held: The accountants had continued to act, and therefore were not in a better position than … Continue reading Re Ledingham-Smith: ChD 1993

Lakatamia Shipping Company Ltd v Su and Others: CA 14 May 2014

The claimant had obtained a freezing order in standard form against the defendant company. The Director of the company had similar sole positions in three other companies. The claimant obtained a similar order against the assets of the other companies, even though not directly parties to the action. The defendant appealed. Held: The appeal failed. … Continue reading Lakatamia Shipping Company Ltd v Su and Others: CA 14 May 2014

Bilta (UK) Ltd and Others v Nazir and Others: ChD 30 Jul 2012

The company was said to have engaged in a fraud based on false European Trading Scheme Allowances, and had been wound up by the Revenue. The liquidators, in the company name, now sought recovery from former directors and associates. Held: The court dismissed the application: ‘First, the fact that there is, in accordance with my … Continue reading Bilta (UK) Ltd and Others v Nazir and Others: ChD 30 Jul 2012