Jarman v Lambert and Cooke Contractors Ltd: CA 1951
The words ‘pending’ or ‘anticipated’ in the subsection were the words habitually used in connection with legal professional privilege, and ‘The privilege only obtains if litigation is ‘pending or anticipated’, and in that connection it is well settled that a mere vague apprehension of litigation generally is not sufficient . . .’ Judges: Denning LJ … Continue reading Jarman v Lambert and Cooke Contractors Ltd: CA 1951