The court discussed the scope of the disciplinary process undertaken by the respondent: ‘The fact that the process is investigative and inquisitorial rather than a form of litigation between the parties . . does not mean that the medical service committee or the authority is entitled to investigate and make findings on matters not the subject of complaint.’
Judges:
Auld LJ
Citations:
[1995] 1 WLR 961
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
See Also – Regina v General Medical Council ex parte Dr K S Trivedi CA 3-Mar-1996
. .
See Also – Trivedi, Regina (on the Application Of) v General Medical Council CA 14-Nov-1996
. .
See Also – Trivedi v the General Medical Council PC 18-Nov-1996
(Professional Conduct Committee of the GMC) . .
See Also – Regina v Secretary of State for Health and Family Health Service Appeal Unit ex parte Trivedi CA 13-Dec-1996
. .
See Also – Regina v South Humberside Health Authority ex parte Trivedi Admn 17-Apr-1997
. .
Cited – Nicholas Cavanagh Raymond Bhatt Frank Redmond v The Health Service Commissioner CA 15-Dec-2005
A parent had complained about the closure of a hospital unit which led to his daughter not receiving treatment. The Commissioner in her report commented adversely on the doctors involved. Both doctors and the parent sought judicial review of the . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Health Professions, Administrative
Updated: 02 February 2022; Ref: scu.237701