Site icon swarb.co.uk

Windle v Dunning and Son Ltd: 1968

The court considered the meaning of the word ‘use’ in road traffic legislation: ‘… In my judgment, as was said by the Lord Justice-General (Lord Clyde) in giving judgment in MacLeod v Penman, Hamilton v Blair and Meechan, Hawthorn v Knight , ‘The presence in the section of the alternatives of causing or permitting the use must limit the scope of what is ‘using’.

Judges:

Lord Parker CJ

Citations:

[1968] 2 All ER 46

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedJones v Director of Public Prosecutions Admn 26-Mar-1998
A van was stopped carrying a delivery of coal. The insurance was for social domestic and pleasure purposes only. The owner appealed a conviction for using it without insurance.
Held: ‘using’ when the description of the offence in connection . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Road Traffic

Updated: 13 May 2022; Ref: scu.190483

Exit mobile version