Site icon swarb.co.uk

Van Ginkel Waddinxveen v Inspecteur der Omzetbelasting: ECJ 12 Nov 1992

(Judgment) Article 26 of Directive 77/388: Sixth Directive, which concerns the special scheme applicable to travel agents in the matter of imposition of value added tax, must be interpreted as meaning that the fact that the transport of the traveller is not arranged by a travel agent or tour operator and that the latter merely provides the traveller with holiday accommodation is not such as to exclude the services provided by such undertakings from the field of application of that provision
The court said that the provision in the Directive: ‘makes the application of that article subject to the condition that the travel agent shall deal with customers in his own name and not as an intermediary. It is for the national court before which a dispute concerning the application of these provisions is brought to inquire, having regard to all the details of the case, and in particular the nature of the travel agent’s contractual obligations towards the traveller, whether or not that condition is met.’

Citations:

C-163/91, [1992] EUECJ C-163/91, [1996] STC 825

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

European

Cited by:

CitedRevenue and Customs v Secret Hotels2 Ltd SC 5-Mar-2014
The Court was asked as to: ‘the liability for Value Added Tax of a company which markets and arranges holiday accommodation through an on-line website. The outcome turns on the appropriate characterisation of the relationship between the company, . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

VAT

Updated: 01 June 2022; Ref: scu.160728

Exit mobile version