Site icon swarb.co.uk

Tanna v Post Office: EAT 1981

The applicant sought appointment as a post-master, and claimed race discrimination when the respondent failed to interview or appoint him. He was required only to provide premises and to ensure that services were provided without being obliged personally to do anything.
Held: The contract which he sought as a sub-postmaster would not require him ‘personally to execute work’. These words required ‘that the person entering into a contract shall himself be under an obligation personally to do work or labour.’ and ‘It is a contract personally to execute any work or labour. That, it seems to us, quite plainly requires that the person entering into a contract shall himself be under an obligation personally to do work or labour. It may well be that some of what he undertakes to do he may delegate, but in our judgment it is essential, for there to be ’employment’, that the person making the contract shall himself undertake to do, at any rate some of the work or labour.’ The section did not apply.
References: [1981] ICR 374
Judges: Slynn P
Statutes: Race Relations Act 1976 78(1)
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
This case cites:

This case is cited by:

These lists may be incomplete.
Last Update: 27 November 2020; Ref: scu.194282 br>

Exit mobile version