‘application for judicial review of two decisions of the Fitness to Practise Panel, FTPP, of the Medical Practitioner’s Tribunal Service of the General Medical Council. The registrant Claimant faces allegations that her fitness to practise is impaired. The first decision . . held that five judgments of the High Court and one of the Court of Appeal Criminal Division in six cases of alleged non-accidental head injury to infants, ‘shaken baby syndrome’, in which the registrant had given evidence as an expert consultant paediatric neuropathologist, would be admitted in evidence subject to redactions to exclude most, but not all, says the Claimant, of the adverse comments and findings in the judgments.’
Ouseley J
[2015] EWHC 299 (Admin)
Bailii
England and Wales
Health Professions
Updated: 03 January 2022; Ref: scu.543095