Site icon swarb.co.uk

Roslingand Others v Pinnegar: CA 9 Oct 1998

When asked to interpret the permitted extent of use of a right of way, the court may assist the parties by working out for them some guidelines as to what would be a reasonable user rather than simply making a general injunction forbidding excessive use.

Citations:

[1998] EWCA Civ 1510, (1998) 54 P and CR 124

Links:

Bailii

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Cited by:

CitedThompson v Bee and Another CA 20-Nov-2009
The parties disputed the extent and nature of the use allowed for an unregistered but express right of way. The track had been obtained by use for agriculture. The dominant owner appealed against a finding that it was limited to agricultural use, . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Land

Updated: 25 November 2022; Ref: scu.144989

Exit mobile version