Site icon swarb.co.uk

Regina v Lord Chancellor and others ex parte Riniker: CA 28 Feb 1997

The applicant sought judicial review of a refusal of her request that a judgment of the Court of Appeal should not be published.
Held: The applicants complaints were not well founded. ‘Her attempt to restrain publication of the Court of Appeal is impossible because no English Court has jurisdiction to restrain publication of a judgment by injunction, and this Court has itself declined to order any stay such as might have prevented the publication of its judgment.’

Citations:

[1997] EWCA Civ 1127

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

See AlsoRiniker v University College London EAT 5-Feb-1997
. .
CitedGeorge Bray v Ford HL 1896
The Court ordered a new trial on the ground of there having been a misdirection of the jury. . .
CitedIsaacs v Robertson PC 13-Jun-1984
(St Vincent and The Grenadines) Where the point at issue before the Board was as to a point of procedure with no direct comparable provision in UK law, the Board of the Privy Council should be reluctant to depart from the interpretation set down by . .
CitedCraig v Kanssen CA 1943
There had been a failure to serve process where service of process was required. The result was that the order made based upon that process was irregular.
Held: In the exercise of its inherent jurisdiction, the Court was entitled to set it . .

Cited by:

See AlsoRiniker v University College London CA 25-Nov-1998
. .
See AlsoRiniker v University College London CA 31-Mar-1999
The writ office of the High Court unjustifiably rejected a writ which the plaintiff asked to be issued and did not issue it until the limitation period had expired. The court held that it had inherent jurisdiction to direct that the writ should be . .
See AlsoRiniker v University College London EAT 23-Aug-1999
EAT Contract of Employment – Breach of Contract
EAT Contract of Employment – Breach of Contract. . .
See alsoRiniker v University College London (Practice Note) CA 5-Apr-2001
The Employment Appeal Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to hear an appeal which does not set out to disturb any part of the order made by the original tribunal. There is no inherent power in the Court of Appeal to bypass the prohibition in . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Litigation Practice

Updated: 05 November 2022; Ref: scu.141523

Exit mobile version