Site icon swarb.co.uk

Regina v Jennings, Regina v Johnson, Regina v Mullins: CACD 6 Sep 1993

No appeal lies against a Crown Court decision not to sever an indictment at a preparatory hearing. As an interlocutory order no appeal lay.

Citations:

Ind Summary 18-Oct-1993, Ind Summary 06-Sep-1993, Times 29-Oct-1993, (1993) 98 Cr App R 308

Statutes:

Criminal Justice Act 1987 7(1) 9(11)

Jurisdiction:

England and Wales

Citing:

CitedIn re Gunawardena, Harbutt and Banks CACD 1990
The defendant applied to stay the proceedings on the grounds that they were an abuse of process.
Held: The application for leave to appeal was rejected. The application to stay was not within the ambit of the preparatory hearing and therefore . .

Cited by:

CitedRegina v Claydon; Regina v Regina v Hall; Regina v Costall; Regina v French CACD 13-Jun-2001
The defendants faced substantial trials involving drugs offences. At a preparatory hearing the court made decisions about abuse of process and as to what evidence might be admitted. The prosecutor said there was no right of appeal.
Held: . .
CitedH, Regina v (Interlocutory application: Disclosure) HL 28-Feb-2007
The trial judge had refused an order requested at a preparatory hearing by the defence for the disclosure of documents held by the prosecutor. The House was now asked whether a right of appeal existed against such a refusal.
Held: The practice . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.

Criminal Practice

Updated: 25 May 2022; Ref: scu.86995

Exit mobile version