A claim was made that the defendant had disturbed the common by digging and removing turf and by digging a fish pond.
Held: A finding that the digging of turfs was a disturbance but not the construction of the pond was not repugnant because the allegation was for disturbance in different respects.
Citations:
(1638) Cro Car 495, (1638) 79 ER 1027
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Land
Updated: 05 May 2022; Ref: scu.269749