Site icon swarb.co.uk

Pimlico Plumbers Ltd and Another v Smith: EAT 21 Nov 2014

EAT Contract of Employment : Whether Established – WORKING TIME REGULATIONS – Worker
Serota QC HHJ
[2014] UKEAT 0495 – 12 – 2111, 2015] CN 43
Bailii
England and Wales
Cited by:
Appeal fromPimlico Plumbers Ltd and Another v Smith CA 10-Feb-2017
The plumbers appealed against a finding that the plumbers it employed were workers and entitled toassociated benefits.
Sir Terence Etherton MR summarised the case law and said: ‘ I would summarise as follows the applicable principles as to the . .
At EATPimlico Plumbers Ltd and Another v Smith SC 13-Jun-2018
The parties disputed whether Mr Smith had been an employee of or worker with the company so as to bring associated rights into play. The contract required the worker to provide an alternate worker to cover if necessary.
Held: The company’s . .
CitedStuart Delivery Ltd v Augustine CA 19-Oct-2021
Obligation to Perfom Work Personally was Critical
This appeal concerns the status of a courier delivering goods by moped. The question on the appeal is whether an employment tribunal was entitled to find that the claimant, Mr Augustine, was a worker within the meaning of section 230(3)(b) of the . .

Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Updated: 20 October 2021; Ref: scu.539617 br>

Exit mobile version