EAT VICTIMISATION DISCRIMINATION – Protected disclosure
Dismissal for making a protected disclosure Employment Tribunal decision upheld.
Suffering a detriment for the same reason. Employment Tribunal decision inadequate and committed to a different decision for determination.
Judges:
Wilkie J
Citations:
[2008] UKEAT 0094 – 08 – 1605
Links:
Statutes:
Employment Rights Act 1996 47B 103(A)
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Citing:
Cited – Barke v Seetec Business Technology Centre Ltd CA 16-May-2005
Challenge to the lawfulness of the practice of the EAT in referring back to the IT deficient reasons with an invitation to expand upon them.
Held: The words ‘disposing of’ in the section meant ‘dealing with conclusively’ rather than . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Employment
Updated: 18 July 2022; Ref: scu.271320