A vendor’s lien was postponed to the equitable interest of a third party with whom the purchaser from the vendor had had dealings.
Citations:
(1884) 26 Ch D 501
Cited by:
Analysed – Barclays Bank Plc v Estates and Commercial Limited CA 20-Feb-1996
Millett LJ discussed the assertion of a vendor’s lien where a third party would be adversely affected: ‘A party with an equitable charge can be taken to agree to the postponement of his property against any party who was allowed to his knowledge to . .
Cited – Bank of Scotland Plc v King and others ChD 23-Nov-2007
The parties contracted to buy and sell a property. The lending bank sought possession, saying that it had advanced the money which had been spent acquirng the property. The defendant purchasers said that completion had not taken place, the full . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Land, Contract
Updated: 01 May 2022; Ref: scu.261517