The claimants were police officers, subject to disciplinary proceedings after a complaint by an arrested terrorist subject that he had been assaulted. The allegations were dismissed, but they now complained that the respondent had not implemented measures to protect them in the course of civil proceedings begun by the arrested suspect against the respondent.
Judges:
Jay J
Citations:
[2015] EWHC 1249 (QB), [2015] CN 746
Links:
Jurisdiction:
England and Wales
Cited by:
Appeal from – James-Bowen and Others v Commissioner of Police for The Metropolis CA 30-Nov-2016
Appeal against the order of Jay J. striking out the particulars of claim and entering judgment for the respondent, the Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, in an action brought against him by the four appellants, all of whom were, at the time . .
At first instance – James-Bowen and Others v Commissioner of Police of The Metropolis SC 25-Jul-2018
The Court was asked whether the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (‘the Commissioner’) owes a duty to her officers, in the conduct of proceedings against her based on their alleged misconduct, to take reasonable care to protect them from . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Litigation Practice, Police
Updated: 09 July 2022; Ref: scu.546273