The applicants alleged that the admission of witness statements from the deceased alleged victims at their trial rendered the proceedings unfair.
Ineta Ziemele, P
4184/10 – Chamber Judgment, [2014] ECHR 1394
Bailii
European Convention on Human Rights
Human Rights
Citing:
At SC – Horncastle and Others, Regina v SC 9-Dec-2009
Each defendant said they had not received a fair trial in that the court had admitted written evidence of a witness he had not been allowed to challenge. The witnesses had been victims, two of whom had died before trial. It was suggested that the . .
See Also – Horncastle And Others v The United Kingdom ECHR 30-Jan-2013
The claimants alleged unfair in their trial after admission in evidence of statements of witnesses who had died before the trial. . .
Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete.
Human Rights, Criminal Evidence
Updated: 24 December 2021; Ref: scu.540019